Categories: Letters to the Editor, OpinionAt the point of being totally redundant, I find it quite perverse listening to and reading about the sexual misconduct in Hollywood, Washington, the news media and anywhere else men and women interact with each other.It’s not news; it’s gossip.Does anyone believe that the casting couch hasn’t been part of Hollywood or show biz since day one? Does anyone really believe that people in power don’t take advantage of people that are not? Does anyone really not get ill listening to our politicians trying to profess proper moral behavior? Unfortunately, this conduct between men and women is human nature. Most of the time, it’s between consenting adults. However, when it’s not and the innocent get preyed upon, then we have an issue that needs attention.There’s no way the Catholic Church can be forgiven for what was allowed to happen with pedophile priests. How about what occurred at Penn State?In both situations, it was about the money and notoriety of the institution rather than the innocent having been injured by a culture that allowed it. That’s a much bigger problem than a few people in show biz behaving the way they do.Unfortunately, people and institutions with power over people will do whatever they can do to squirm out of a situation that will affect their status, income and ego. Calling multiple accusers liars, as Judge Roy Moore is basically doing and professing what a moral person he is, surely makes you question what kind of egomaniac he truly is. And I’m afraid it will never change.Bob BeliveGlenvilleMore from The Daily Gazette:EDITORIAL: Find a way to get family members into nursing homesEDITORIAL: Beware of voter intimidationEDITORIAL: Urgent: Today is the last day to complete the censusFoss: Should main downtown branch of the Schenectady County Public Library reopen?EDITORIAL: Thruway tax unfair to working motorists
World Cup Why can Diego Costa play for Spain? FIFA’s eligibility rules explained Ryan Kelly Last updated 1 year ago 02:06 2/17/18 FacebookTwitterRedditcopy Comments(0) Getty/Goal composite World Cup The Atletico Madrid is one of a number of footballers who played for one country before switching to another and it is an area that tends to confuse The World Cup is just four months away and 32 national teams will soon converge upon Russia to take part in the biggest sports event on the planet.In recent times, the allure of playing on the grandest stage in football has led to some footballers suddenly declaring their allegiance to another country and it seems to have become more common. One of the highest profile examples in the past few years was Diego Costa, who swapped Brazil for Spain, but he is by no means alone.AdChoices广告Some other examples include Nabil Bentaleb, who declared for Algeria after playing for France at youth level and Nacer Chadli, who now plays for Belgium despite featuring for Morocco. Article continues below Editors’ Picks Lyon treble & England heartbreak: The full story behind Lucy Bronze’s dramatic 2019 Liverpool v Man City is now the league’s biggest rivalry and the bitterness is growing Megan Rapinoe: Born & brilliant in the U.S.A. A Liverpool legend in the making: Behind Virgil van Dijk’s remarkable rise to world’s best player Many of those incidents occurred ahead of major tournaments and inevitably sparked discussions over the eligibility rules for national teams, which have been tweaked on a number of occasions over the years.The rules themselves can sometimes seem impossibly complicated and difficult to understand, but fear not, Goal will have a go at breaking it down.Contents1. Why footballers can represent more than one national team2. What are the limits?3. Why can Diego Costa play for Spain?4. British ‘Home Nations’5. The Irish situationWhy can footballers represent more than one national team? Before we begin, a more detailed explainer of the eligibility rules can be found here. Are you ready? Here we go…Basically, in order to be eligible to play for a national team, a footballer must possess the nationality of the country he or she wishes to play for.Generally speaking this restricts them to a single team. So, a German national can only play for Germany, a French national can only play for France and so on.However, football does not exist in a vacuum and its participants are a reflection of the world in all its variety. That means that footballers themselves are not necessarily monolithic. They may possess more than one nationality and thus qualify to play for more than one team.For example, an individual could have the right to a number of nationalities based on where they are born, their ancestry, or they could earn the right to a new nationality via residency.In some cases, a single nationality can allow a player to play for a number of different teams. The United Kingdom, for example, does not compete in football as a single entity. Uniquely, it has four teams (England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales) known colloquially as the ‘Home Nations’. In order to play for any of those teams, one requires British nationality.As mentioned though, there are limits put in place to ensure that the landscape of international football is not cynically exploited.Still here? Stick with us…What are the limits to switching national team? So, we’ve established that nationality primarily governs what national team a footballer can play for, but what if they have multiple nationalities or their singular nationality allows them to play for more than one team?The current rules allow players who fit that description to play for one team and then switch national team if they so desire, but they can do so only once. Players who have: more than one nationality; acquired a new nationality; or are eligible to represent more than one association due to a single nationality can make the change.If a player has played at any level from U-17 up to U-21 for one team, they are free to make a switch to another team for which they are eligible as long as they meet the criteria laid out in FIFA’s statutes.Crucially, however, they cannot change teams if they have already played a senior competitive game. Appearances in senior friendly games are not enough to bar a player from making a switch.After a switch has been made official a player cannot switch back to their original association if they have a change of heart. Administrators from a number of associations and confederations have queried some of the current limitations, such as the competitive cap precluding a change of team. Indeed, late last year, Reuters reported that FIFA would ‘look into’ changing the rules to make them less restrictive. However, it remains to be seen if there will be any changes.So why can Diego Costa play for Spain? We get that all of the above can be quite confusing, but, basically, Costa is allowed to play for Spain on account of his Spanish nationality, which he gained through residence. While he was born in Brazil, he was also eligible to play for Spain having gained citizenship in July 2013 and the fact that he had been a resident there for five years satisfied FIFA’s rules.Costa had played two friendly games for Brazil in 2013 – against Italy and Russia – but, as mentioned, senior friendly games do not bar a player from making a change of national team.Had he played a senior competitive game, such as a World Cup qualifier or a Copa America match, he would have been irrevocably tied to Brazil.It is an incredibly emotive topic, with many people holding their national identity dear, and Costa’s decision to play for Spain instead of his native Brazil prompted uproar – it was seen as an act of treachery.The change of national team occurred in the lead up to the 2014 World Cup, which was being staged in Brazil, a detail that only served to exacerbate the ire of Brazil fans.Costa is not alone, of course. There are plenty of examples of players who have worked within FIFA’s rules in order to change national team.Paris Saint-Germain midfielder Thiago Motta took a similar path to the striker, playing for Brazil in friendlies before switching to Italy in 2011.Unlike Costa though, Motta’s Italian nationality was based on his ancestry rather than residence, but both are valid when it comes to national team eligibility.Can British footballers play for any of the ‘Home Nations’? Not exactly. British footballers don’t have a carte blanche when it comes to which national team they can play for – they, like every other player, must satisfy FIFA’s rules.British nationality is a prerequisite for footballers who wish to play for England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales, as well as Anguilla, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Gibraltar, Montserrat and Turks & Caicos Islands.Because British nationality covers so many nations, FIFA has designed the rules so that a player must satisfy certain conditions before becoming eligible to play for a national team.In short, a player must be born on the territory of the association he or she wishes to play for. They can also qualify through what is commonly known as ‘the Granny Rule’ – if their biological mother or father, or either grandparent was born on that territory.The ‘Home Nations’ have come to an agreement to remove the other criterion, which takes into account a two-year period of residence in the territory of a national team.There are other nationalities that cover multiple national teams, including American, Chinese, Danish, French, Dutch and New Zealander.What about the Irish situation? There are a number of unique situations around the world where political realities have led to confusion and anger regarding FIFA’s eligibility rules.One such example relates to footballers who are born in Northern Ireland, which is one of the four ‘Home Nations’ teams.With some exceptions, individuals born in Northern Ireland tend to have a birthright to both British and Irish citizenship.This means that many footballers from the region can play for the representative teams of Northern Ireland or the Republic of Ireland. In practice this has seen some individuals play for Northern Ireland before switching to the Republic of Ireland and vice versa.Former Manchester United midfielder Darron Gibson is an example of a Northern Ireland-born player opting to play for the Republic of Ireland.The issue came to a head in 2010 when the IFA (Northern Ireland) took the FAI (Republic of Ireland) and FIFA to the Court of Arbitration of Sport.The IFA sought to end the practice of Northern Ireland-born players with no territorial connection to the Republic of Ireland from playing for their teams.However, the IFA’s objection and case was founded on an erroneous reading of the rules and was unsuccessful.